One of my best friend's turned 50 on Thursday and 14 of us went out to a surprise dinner at the Ridge Restaurant (Canberra, very good, not great, but, seemingly, always reliable).
He and his daughter came (late) without grog (prearranged) so I brought 4 bottles (as his birthday present).
Memory vibes only on the following :
Fritz Haag Brauneberger Juffer-Sonnenuhr Auslese Riesling 1983 - still fresh and lively with a delectable core of sweet peach/nectarine/citrussy fruit and wonderful acidity to provide counterbalance.
92Penfolds 1980 Bin 80A Cabernet/Shiraz - the visual condition was nigh-on perfect (colour, level, capsule and label). The cork disintegrated upon opening.
Held a good colour for the age but the nose and palate were simply not a patch on the bottle I opened last year. A very good drink but that's about it (still displayed some attractive, still youthful, sweet fruit, lively acidity and melting tannin) but ohso typical of the well-documented inconsistency with this label. No more lotteries with this one for me.
87Ch. Coutet 1981 - a real sleeper of a wine, this one. Perhaps my third bottle this year and every one has been super. Displays gorgeous aromatics, impeccable balance, wonderful line, still with plenty of reserves of fruit and acidity as well as a superb finish. Surprisingly quite a "big" wine for a Coutet (reknowned for their "elegance"). My, how well did this Barsac property do in this "unheralded" vintage!
93Morris of Rutherglen Cellar Release Muscat - simply phenomenal. Incredibly lush with spicy jumbo raisans and Christmas cake (and many other splendid things) wrapped in a shroud of rancio, caramel oak; incredible viscosity providing a plush and decadent mouthfeel, then almost impossibly transposes to a cleansing, astringent-filled finish of enormous calibre and duration.
95Some of the other guests let me have a sip of a couple of their wines - the
2006 Stonier's Chardonnay seemed very good with some nice barrel work on the nose and a palate that was a little flat to me but overall seemed an "ok" wine. The
1998 Orlando St. Hugo was very disappointing compared to what I remember of it in its youth (circa 92/93 points). The wonderful fruit has been replaced with an overabundance of pretty ugly oak - something that worried me (but not to the same extent as this) in the last bottle I opened some time ago. Either it's in a very bad phase or the wine is rooted. Might get
75 points if I was feeling very generous on last night's performance!
Last edited by David Lole on Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:21 am, edited 1 time in total.