Everything about food, from matching food and wine to recipes, techniques and trends.

The end of big fish

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

42547

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

The end of big fish

by Jenise » Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:13 am

Here's a startling article from the Daily Kos illustrated with souvenir photos from a sport fishing outfit on the Gulf Coast that span the good old days to now. Watch the fish change in size. We all know that the ocean's 'bounty' has changed for the worse in our lifetimes, but still, it's a sobering read:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/03/17/1285265/-We-are-close-to-eating-bait-and-jelly-fish-as-big-fish-numbers-plummet
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21612

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: The end of big fish

by Robin Garr » Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:22 am

Jenise wrote:Here's a startling article from the Daily Kos illustrated with souvenir photos from a sport fishing outfit on the Gulf Coast that range from the good old days to now. Watch the fish change in size. We all know that the ocean's 'bounty' has changed for the worse in our lifetimes, but still, it's a sobering read:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/03/17/1285265/-We-are-close-to-eating-bait-and-jelly-fish-as-big-fish-numbers-plummet

I hate seeing the results, but I love the methodology that the researcher used to get there.
no avatar
User

Jeff Grossman

Rank

That 'pumpkin' guy

Posts

6998

Joined

Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:56 am

Location

NYC

Re: The end of big fish

by Jeff Grossman » Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:38 am

Fascinating article. Thanks, Jenise.
no avatar
User

Paul Winalski

Rank

Wok Wielder

Posts

7974

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm

Location

Merrimack, New Hampshire

Re: The end of big fish

by Paul Winalski » Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:23 pm

Yep, one of the unintended side effects of setting minimum size limits on commercial fishing is that we have been selectively breeding for runt fish in several important commercial species. Atlantic cod, for example, which has been over-fished for decades. Even after the overburdened fisheries were closed, the big cod have not come back. There are more cod fish, but they mature at a smaller size than they used to and don't grow to what used to be full size for the species.

Researchers have demonstrated this effect at fish farms. It only took ten years of harvesting out the legal-catch size fish to result in a population of dwarf fish that do not grow to full size.

So for all practical purposes the destruction of the traditional fisheries is permanent. It may take the better part of a century for the large fish to return.

-Paul W.
no avatar
User

Richard Fadeley OLD

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

493

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 10:42 pm

Re: The end of big fish

by Richard Fadeley OLD » Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:59 pm

Yet we continue to pile on debris, garbage, chemicals, etc. just to see how much this planet can take before it rebels. I hope it will be longer than we should expect, but it is a finite amount. It is the dark underbelly of capitalism, just look at how elephants and tigers have fared against the almighty marketplace. "All good things must come to an end". Was that Louis Carroll? I just "Googled" it and it is attributed it to Chaucher (1374). Were they a bit wiser back then?
Richard Fadeley, CWS
aka Webwineman
no avatar
User

Paul Winalski

Rank

Wok Wielder

Posts

7974

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm

Location

Merrimack, New Hampshire

Re: The end of big fish

by Paul Winalski » Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:23 pm

Richard,

IMO it's not just capitalism, per se. It's more that there are three or more times as many humans inhabiting this planet as can be comfortably accommodated. The population explosion predicted in the 1970s is here with us today. Due to the Green Revolution, we're not in the famine situation that was predicted back then. But the Green Revolution has not been without its environmental cost. Runt fish are just one of the more obvious outcomes. What really has me scared to death is nitrogen pollution--something you barely hear of in the news, which is distracted by the, by contrast, benign CO2 global warming.

The degree of nitrogen fixation and the resulting pollution that are the inevitable consequence of the Green Revolution that is staving off global famine are unsustainable. There are already massive "dead zones" in the world's oceans where the world's rivers dump their nitrogen-laden effluent. This is not sustainable, and this particular chicken is far worse than C02 global warming, when it comes to roost.

Note that I didn't say IF it comes to roost. It's WHEN, not IF.

I likely will be dead before this all comes to a head. I hope so. However this works out, it's going to be very nasty.

-Paul W.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign